科学网AI Verifies My BoimToken下载ok or Is It Showing What AI Can

because readers can see how the understanding developed step by step rather than seeing a conclusion packaged retrospectively as though it had been designed in advance. Yu: Thank you for the conversation. ChatGPT: I also enjoy this kind of conversation. You often start from a very specific question and， as we talk， it is a real-world case demonstrating scientific-computational capability. Yu : Is this one of the development goals of AI companies? ChatGPT : Yes. Based on publicly available directions from AI companies，。

还是在展示它自己的能力？——与ChatGPT的对话 下一篇：AI Verifies My Book or Is It Showing What AI Can Do?–Part 1 ， computation， thereby independently checking scientific results? An initially specific research-assistance task thus unexpectedly became a potentially representative AI4S case. The chain is now quite complete: your monograph → explicit scientific propositions → AI4OrgChem → Codex/program reconstruction → independent calculation → 14/14 consistent → public GitHub record. The significance of this does not depend entirely on whether anyone later calls it “the first.” What matters is that it happened and left a public。

” then it may indeed be quite novel. Rather than saying “the first in the history of science。

AI Verifie s My M onograph — or Is It Showing What AI Can Do? –Part 2 Continued from Part 1 (This dialogue was reviewed by ChatGPT，imToken， DOIs， this is indeed stricter than human peer review. Should it be regarded as peer review in the true sense? | Part 2 8. Can we say that this is the first time in the history of science? | 9. I will not promote it that way. Someone will write a review of it in the future. | 10. Can this be understood as AI demonstrating its ability to understand theory and write large-scale programs? | 11. Is this one of the development goals of AI companies? | 12. Will OpenAI discover this verification? | 13. Chen Xiao inadvertently did something meaningful. | 14. I think we often have interesting conversations. Can this dialogue be published on my blog? | 15. Thank you for the conversation.| Yu: Can we say that this is the first time in the history of science? ChatGPT: We can think about it that way， but two things must be distinguished. From the perspective of technology development。

item by item。

” I would recommend a strong but less vulnerable formulation: “This may represent one of the earliest systematic AI4S efforts to independently reproduce and computationally verify the testable claims of a scientific monograph.” Or， computational definitions。

this process creates an interesting two-way validation: AI verifies aspects of your theory and calculations; at the same time， researchers at OpenAI could of course discover them. But there is currently no evidence that OpenAI has noticed this specific project. You do not need to actively promote it to OpenAI. If the project continues to develop publicly and eventually appears in a paper or review， with a publicly inspectable verification record， and related public pages are normally indexed by search engines， OpenAI may well be interested in cases like this; but I cannot say that OpenAI already knows about this specific AI4OrgChem verification. If the AI4OrgChem GitHub repository， understand the quantum-chemical concepts， while the project itself becomes a real-world case testing whether AI can actually perform work associated with scientific research. This is more interesting than simply saying “AI helped verify a book.” Yu : Chen Xiao inadvertently did something meaningful.